Search
Recommended Sites
Related Links






   

Informative Articles

No . . . Limit Poker
So, you're sitting on the dealer button and look down to find two Aces in the hole. This is going to be a good hand. As the action comes your way, player after player seem to be calling the big blind, looking to see a flop. Now the action is on you...

Online Poker Free E-course
If you're looking to improve your win percentages or if you're just interested in learning to play online poker then this free poker e-course is ideal for you. There are no hidden costs and its 100% free. The course will take you through the...

Poker etiquette
Good poker etiquette will make you a popular poker player. Other players will applaud your successes and commiserate with you in your failures. All poker players, but especially the more experienced ones, should provide an example of good poker...

Poker Fashion
Just like any other media driven sport in the world, poker has its own fashion and its own distinct look. And just like all other sport related looks, the 'poker look' stems from the stars of the sport. You have your jerseys from sports like...

Three Card Poker Bonuses
One of the things that might confuse people regarding Three Card Poker is the subject on the bonuses that can be paid out. These bonuses reward players who have been dealt strong poker hands. There are two types of bonuses, the first being the...

 
Amateur vs. Professional Poker Players

I'm sick of these Amateurs! I hope *insert pro player's name here* wipes the floor with him!

That seems to be a common refrain in poker forums recently, in light of all the success the amateurs are enjoying. We ran a poll on my web site asking members to predict “Who will win WSOP 2004?" I think “a professional” beat “an amateur” by at least a 2:1 margin, and about 90% gave Chris Moneymaker hardly a snowball's chance at even making the final few tables.

So why the angst? Is it because of the World Poker Tour coverage on the Travel Channel where so many of the new players today saw and became infatuated with names like Phil Ivey and Howard Lederer and just can't stand watching their “horse” lose?

Lets consider the differences between the typical amateur and professional poker player at one of these expensive televised tournaments. First, the amateur holds a regular job, albeit generally well paying. Remember “the Dentist” in World Poker Tour coverage? We probably won't be seeing “The Plumber” or “The Garbage Man” dropping several thousand dollars on a poker tournament in the near future. The professional on the other hand considers poker his full time job.

The second difference between the amateur and professional is...is...hmm. What is the second difference? Is there another difference?

The professional players have excellent poker skills, starting hand selection, flop play, reading the other players, knowing when to bluff, when to call, when to get out of the way. But then again, so do the amateurs we see at the final table.

Of course there is “dead money” at these tournaments, but can anyone make a legitimate argument that all because someone fixes teeth during the day that he or she is a lesser poker player at night?

I'll be the first to admit that I prefer to see a “name” or two at the final table, but I also know that it is nigh impossible to make it to the final table of one of these things on sheer luck.

Time to give the amateurs some credit?


About the Author
Keith Freeman is the webmaster of www.poker-strategy.org" target="_blank">Poker-strategy.org , a professionally designed poker strategy page. He can be reached at coach@poker-strategy.org

Sign up for PayPal and start accepting credit card payments instantly.